Psychology Teaching Review Vol 21 No 1 Spring 2015

Journal telescopic statement

The principal purpose of the Periodical of Educational Psychology ^® is to publish original, primary psychological research pertaining to teaching across all ages and educational levels. A secondary purpose of the Journal is the occasional publication of exceptionally important meta-analysis manufactures that are pertinent to educational psychology. Please note, the Journal does not typically publish reliability and validity studies of specific tests or cess instruments.

Disclaimer: APA and the editors of Periodical of Educational Psychology assume no responsibility for statements and opinions advanced by the authors of its articles

Journal highlights

• Submission Guidelines
• Editorial Board
• Abstracting & Indexing
• Special Issues
• Open Scientific discipline

Submission Guidelines

Prior to submission, please carefully read and follow the submission guidelines detailed beneath. Manuscripts that do not conform to the submission guidelines may be returned without review.

Submission

To submit to the editorial part of Panayiota Kendeou, please submit manuscripts electronically through the Manuscript Submission Portal in Microsoft Discussion (.docx) or LaTex (.tex) equally a nada file with an accompanied Portable Document Format (.pdf) of the manuscript file.

Set up manuscripts according to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association using the 7^thursday edition. Manuscripts may be copyedited for bias-free language (come across Chapter 5 of the Publication Manual). APA Style and Grammer Guidelines for the 7^thursday edition are available.

The Journal of Educational Psychology publishes direct replications. Submissions should include "A Replication of XX Study" in the subtitle of the manuscript too as in the abstract.

Submit Manuscript

Panayiota Kendeou, PhD, editor
Academy of Minnesota

General correspondence may be directed to the editor's function.

In addition to addresses and phone numbers, delight supply email addresses, as nearly communications volition exist by email. Fax numbers, if bachelor, should besides be provided for potential employ past the editorial office and after by the production office.

The Journal of Educational Psychology ^® is now using a software system to screen submitted content for similarity with other published content. The system compares the initial version of each submitted manuscript confronting a database of 40+ million scholarly documents, as well equally content appearing on the open up spider web. This allows APA to check submissions for potential overlap with material previously published in scholarly journals (e.g., lifted or republished cloth).

Transparency and openness

APA endorses the Transparency and Openness Promotion (Height) Guidelines by a community working group in conjunction with the Center for Open Science (Nosek et al. 2015). As outlined in Dr. Panayiota Kendeou'south inaugural editorial (Kendeou, 2021), empirical research, including meta-analyses, submitted to theJournal of Educational Psychology must run across the "disclosure" level for all eight aspects of inquiry planning and reporting. Authors should include a subsection in the method section titled "Transparency and openness." This subsection should detail the efforts the authors accept made to comply with the TOP guidelines. For example:

• We report how we adamant our sample size, all information exclusions (if any), all manipulations, and all measures in the study, and we follow JARS (Kazak, 2018). All data, analysis code, and research materials are available at [stable link to repository]. Data were analyzed using R, version 4.0.0 (R Core Squad, 2020) and the package ggplot, version 3.2.1 (Wickham, 2016). This report'due south design and its assay were not pre-registered.

Links to preregistrations and data, lawmaking, and materials should also exist included in the writer note.

Data, materials, and code

Authors must state whether data and report materials are bachelor and, if and then, where to access them. Recommended repositories include APA's repository on the Open Science Framework (OSF), or authors can access a total listing of other recommended repositories.

In both the author note and at the end of the Method section, specify whether and where the data and material will be available or include a statement noting that they are not available. For submissions with quantitative or simulation analytic methods, state whether the study analysis lawmaking is bachelor, and, if so, where to admission information technology.

For instance:

• All data have been made publicly available at the [repository name] and tin can be accessed at [persistent URL or DOI].
• Materials and analysis code for this study are available by emailing the respective author.
• Materials and analysis code for this study are not bachelor.
• The code behind this assay/simulation has been made publicly available at the [repository proper noun] and tin can be accessed at [persistent URL or DOI].

Preregistration of studies and analysis plans

Preregistration of studies and specific hypotheses can be a useful tool for making strong theoretical claims. Too, preregistration of analysis plans can exist useful for distinguishing confirmatory and exploratory analyses. Investigators are encouraged to preregister their studies and analysis plans prior to conducting the research (e.1000., ClinicalTrials.gov or the Preregistration for Quantitative Research in Psychology template) via a publicly accessible registry organization (e.g., OSF, ClinicalTrials.gov, or other trial registries in the WHO Registry Network).

We recognize that there may be adept reasons to change the analysis plan afterward information technology has been preregistered, and thus encourage authors to do so when appropriate then long as all changes are clearly and transparently disclosed in the manuscript.

Articles must country whether or not any work was preregistered and, if and then, where to access the preregistration. If any aspect of the study is preregistered, include the registry link in the method department and the author note.

For case:

• This written report's design was preregistered; meet [STABLE LINK OR DOI].
• This written report's blueprint and hypotheses were preregistered; see [STABLE LINK OR DOI].
• This study'south analysis plan was preregistered; come across [STABLE LINK OR DOI].
• This report was non preregistered.

Open science badges

Starting in 2020, articles are eligible for open science badges recognizing publicly bachelor data, materials, and/or preregistration plans and analyses. These badges are awarded on a self-disclosure basis.

Applying for open up science badges is optional.

At submission, authors must ostend that criteria have been fulfilled in a signed badge disclosure form (PDF, 33KB) that must be submitted as supplemental textile. If all criteria are met as confirmed by the editor, the form will then exist published with the commodity as supplemental textile.

Authors should likewise annotation their eligibility for the bluecoat(s) in the cover alphabetic character.

For all badges, items must exist made available on an open-access repository with a persistent identifier in a format that is fourth dimension-stamped, immutable, and permanent. For the preregistered badge, this is an institutional registration organization.

Data and materials must exist fabricated available under an open license allowing others to copy, share, and utilise the data, with attribution and copyright as applicable.

Available badges are:

Open Data:
All data necessary to reproduce the reported results that are digitally shareable are fabricated publicly bachelor. Information necessary for replication (e.g., codebooks or metadata) must be included.

Open Data; Protected Access:
A Protected Admission (PA) annotation may be added to open data badges if sensitive, personal data are available only from an canonical third-political party repository that manages access to information to qualified researchers through a documented process. To be eligible for an open data badge with such a notation, the repository must publicly depict the steps necessary to obtain the data and detailed data documentation (east.g. variable names and allowed values) must be fabricated bachelor publicly. View a list of approved repositories .

Open up Materials:
All materials necessary to reproduce the reported results that are digitally shareable, forth with descriptions of non-digital materials necessary for replication, are fabricated publicly available.

Preregistered:
The study's design has been preregistered with descriptions of (a) the research design and report materials, including the planned sample size; (b) the motivating research question or hypothesis; (c) the outcome variable(s); and (d) the predictor variables, including controls, covariates, and independent variables. Preregistered, confirmatory results must be conspicuously distinguished from unregistered, exploratory analyses using headers such as "Results from pre-registered analyses" and "Exploratory analyses."

Preregistered+Analysis Plan:
The report's design has been preregistered along with an analysis program for the inquiry—and results are recorded according to that plan.

Registered Reports

The periodical now also invites submission of Registered Reports. We are particularly interested in Registered Reports for intervention studies and secondary data analyses. Registered reports crave a 2-stage review process. You tin can find specific instructions for submitting Registered Reports online (PDF, 247KB).

Phase i is the submission of the registration, and so-chosen Stage one manuscript. This is a partial manuscript that includes introduction, theoretical framework, rationale for the written report, hypotheses, experimental design, and methods (including an analysis plan). The partial manuscript volition exist reviewed for significance, theoretical framework, methodological approach, and analysis programme.

If the Stage one Registered Report manuscript receives an "in-principal credence (IPA)" information technology means that the study has the potential to exist published if is performed exactly every bit proposed (besides including the proposed statistical evaluation) regardless of the outcome of the study. Subsequently this stage and before data drove begins the study is pre-registered (due east.grand., through the Registered Report tools from OSF).

In Phase 2, the full newspaper undergoes a 2d peer-review process, checking if the study protocol was implemented and if the reasons for potential changes were acceptable. However, a rejection is notwithstanding possible, namely if the study'south execution and assay diverged too much from the proposed study design and/or the manuscript is low quality. The refinement of the discussion and conclusions may still require further revision, but the process volition exist expedited.

Writer contribution statements using CRediT

The APA Publication Manual (seventh ed.), which stipulates that "authorship encompasses…not only persons who practise the writing but likewise those who have made substantial scientific contributions to a written report." In the spirit of transparency and openness, the journal has adopted the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) to depict each writer's individual contributions to the piece of work. CRediT offers authors the opportunity to share an accurate and detailed clarification of their diverse contributions to a manuscript.

Submitting authors will be asked to identify the contributions of all authors at initial submission according to the CRediT taxonomy. If the manuscript is accustomed for publication, the CRediT designations will be published as an author contributions statement in the author note of the final article. All authors should accept reviewed and agreed to their individual contribution(s) earlier submission.

CRediT includes 14 contributor roles, as described beneath:

• Conceptualization: Ideas; formulation or evolution of overarching research goals and aims.
• Data curation: Direction activities to annotate (produce metadata), scrub information and maintain enquiry information (including software code, where information technology is necessary for interpreting the data itself) for initial utilise and subsequently re-use.
• Formal analysis: Application of statistical, mathematical, computational, or other formal techniques to analyze or synthesize study data.
• Funding conquering: Acquisition of the fiscal support for the project leading to this publication.
• Investigation: Conducting a research and investigation procedure, specifically performing the experiments, or data/evidence drove.
• Methodology: Development or design of methodology; creation of models.
• Project administration: Direction and coordination responsibility for the enquiry activeness planning and execution.
• Resources: Provision of written report materials, reagents, materials, patients, laboratory samples, animals, instrumentation, calculating resource, or other assay tools.
• Software: Programming, software development; designing calculator programs; implementation of the calculator lawmaking and supporting algorithms; testing of existing code components.
• Supervision: Oversight and leadership responsibility for the enquiry activity planning and execution, including mentorship external to the core team.
• Validation: Verification, whether as a part of the action or separate, of the overall replication/reproducibility of results/experiments and other enquiry outputs.
• Visualization: Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically visualization/data presentation.
• Writing—original draft: Preparation, cosmos and/or presentation of the published work, specifically writing the initial draft (including substantive translation).
• Writing—review and editing: Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work past those from the original research grouping, specifically critical review, commentary or revision: including pre- or post-publication stages.

Authors can claim credit for more than than one contributor role, and the same part tin be attributed to more than one writer. Not all roles will be applicable to whatever particular scholarly work.

Manuscript preparation

Gear up manuscripts according to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association using the 7^th edition. Manuscripts may exist copyedited for bias-gratuitous language (see Affiliate v of the Publication Manual). APA Style and Grammar Guidelines for the 7^thursday edition are available.

Double-space your manuscript. Other formatting instructions, equally well as instructions on preparing tables, figures, references, metrics, and abstracts, appear in the Publication Manual. Additional guidance on APA Style is available on the APA Style website.

Masked review policy

The journal has adopted a policy of masked review for all submissions, which means that the identities of both authors and reviewers are masked. The cover letter should include all authors' names and institutional affiliations. The first page of text should omit this information but should include the title of the manuscript and the engagement it is submitted.

Every endeavor should be fabricated to see that the manuscript itself contains no clues to the authors' identity, including grant numbers, names of institutions providing IRB approval, self-citations, and links to online repositories for data, materials, code, or preregistrations (east.g., Create a View-merely Link for a Project). Authors should never utilise first person (I, my, we, our) when referring to a report conducted by the writer(southward) or when doing and then reveals the authors' identities, e.chiliad., "in our previous work, Johnson et al., 1998 reported that…" Instead, references to the authors' work should be in tertiary person, e.g., "Johnson et al. (1998) reported that…."

Please annotation that if you include masked references in your manuscript, the editor requests that you place these references in your cover letter, so that the editors can see which articles are existence referenced in your submission.

Include the championship of the manuscript forth with all authors' names and institutional affiliations in the cover letter. The first page of the manuscript should omit the authors' names and affiliations, merely should include the championship of the manuscript and the date it is submitted.

Discussion limits

Manuscripts should by and large not exceed 12,000 words (approximately 40 double-spaced pages in 12-point Times New Roman font), not including references, tables, figures, and appendixes. Editors may return manuscripts longer than 12,000 words for revision if they call back the newspaper is too long. This will involve asking the authors to shorten the paper and return it equally a new submission.

Manuscript guidelines

Adequate clarification of participants and measures are critical to the science and exercise of educational psychology; this allows readers to assess the results, determine generalizability of findings, and brand comparisons in replications, extensions, literature reviews, or secondary information analyses. Authors should run across guidelines for participants and measures (including reliability and validity evidence) in the Publication Manual.

Appropriate indexes of outcome size or strength of human relationship should exist incorporated in the results section of the manuscript (refer of the Publication Transmission). Information that allows the reader to assess non only the significance merely too the magnitude of the observed effects or relationships clarifies the importance of the findings.

Abstract and keywords

All manuscripts must include an abstract containing a maximum of 250 words typed on a divide page. After the abstruse, please supply upward to v keywords or brief phrases.

Periodical Article Reporting Standards

Authors are encouraged to consult the APA Journal Commodity Reporting Standards (JARS) for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research. Updated in 2018, the standards offer ways to ameliorate transparency in reporting to ensure that readers have the data necessary to evaluate the quality of the research and to facilitate collaboration and replication.

The new JARS:

• recommend the division of hypotheses, analyses, and conclusions into main, secondary, and exploratory groupings to let for a full agreement of quantitative analyses presented in a manuscript and to heighten reproducibility;
• offer modules for authors reporting on N-of-ane designs, replications, clinical trials, longitudinal studies, and observational studies, besides as the analytic methods of structural equation modeling and Bayesian analysis; and
• include guidelines on reporting on registration (including making protocols public); participant characteristics, including demographic characteristics; inclusion and exclusion criteria; psychometric characteristics of upshot measures and other variables; and planned data diagnostics and analytic strategy.

The journal also encourages the utilize of the 21-word statement, reporting (i) how the sample size was adamant, (two) all information exclusions, (iii) all manipulations, and (4) all study measures. See Simmons, Nelson, & Simonsohn (2012) for details; include the following statement in the method section:

• We report how nosotros determined our sample size, all data exclusions (if any), all manipulations, and all measures in the study.

References

Listing references in alphabetical order. Each listed reference should be cited in text, and each text citation should be listed in the references section.

Examples of bones reference formats:

Journal aticle

McCauley, South. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2019). Language learning as language utilize: A cross-linguistic model of child language development. Psychological Review, 126(1), i–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000126

Authored book

Brown, L. S. (2018). Feminist therapy (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000092-000

Chapter in an edited book

Balsam, G. F., Martell, C. R., Jones. G. P., & Safren, S. A. (2019). Affirmative cognitive behavior therapy with sexual and gender minority people. In G. Y. Iwamasa & P. A. Hays (Eds.), Culturally responsive cognitive behavior therapy: Practice and supervision (2nd ed., pp. 287–314). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000119-012

Data set up citation

Alegria, K., Jackson, J. Southward., Kessler, R. C., & Takeuchi, D. (2016). Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES), 2001–2003 [Data set]. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Enquiry. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20240.v8

Software/Lawmaking citation

Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v36/i03/

Wickham, H. et al., (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, iv(43), 1686, https://doi.org/ten.21105/joss.01686

All data, program code and other methods must be appropriately cited in the text and listed in the references section.

Tables

Use Word's Insert Tabular array function when y'all create tables. Using spaces or tabs in your table volition create issues when the table is typeset and may result in errors.

Figures

Graphics files are welcome if supplied as Tiff or EPS files. Multipanel figures (i.due east., figures with parts labeled a, b, c, d, etc.) should be assembled into i file. The minimum line weight for line art is 0.5 point for optimal printing. For more information almost acceptable resolutions, fonts, sizing, and other figure issues, please see the general guidelines.

When possible, please place symbol legends below the figure instead of to the side. APA offers authors the option to publish their figures online in colour without the costs associated with print publication of color figures.

The same explanation volition announced on both the online (color) and print (blackness and white) versions. To ensure that the effigy can be understood in both formats, authors should add alternative wording (due east.one thousand., "the ruddy (dark greyness) bars represent") as needed.

For authors who prefer their figures to be published in colour both in print and online, original color figures can be printed in colour at the editor's and publisher'south discretion provided the author agrees to pay:

• $900 for one figure
• an additional $600 for the 2d figure
• an additional $450 for each subsequent figure

Display equations

We strongly encourage you to use MathType (third-political party software) or Equation Editor iii.0 (built into pre-2007 versions of Word) to construct your equations, rather than the equation support that is built into Give-and-take 2007 and Word 2010. Equations composed with the built-in Discussion 2007/Word 2010 equation support are converted to depression-resolution graphics when they enter the product process and must be rekeyed by the typesetter, which may introduce errors.

To construct your equations with MathType or Equation Editor iii.0:

• Go to the Text section of the Insert tab and select Object.
• Select MathType or Equation Editor three.0 in the drop-downwardly menu.
  If y'all take an equation that has already been produced using Microsoft Word 2007 or 2010 and you take access to the total version of MathType vi.v or later, you tin convert this equation to MathType by clicking on MathType Insert Equation. Copy the equation from Microsoft Word and paste it into the MathType box. Verify that your equation is correct, click File, and and then click Update. Your equation has now been inserted into your Word file as a MathType Equation.

Reckoner code

Because altering computer code in any style (e.g., indents, line spacing, line breaks, folio breaks) during the typesetting process could modify its meaning, nosotros treat computer code differently from the residue of your article in our product procedure. To that cease, we asking separate files for figurer code.

In online supplemental materials

We asking that runnable source code exist included every bit supplemental material to the article. For more than information, visit Supplementing Your Article With Online Fabric.

In the text of the article

If you would like to include code in the text of your published manuscript, please submit a separate file with your code exactly every bit you lot want it to appear, using Courier New font with a type size of 8 points. We will brand an image of each segment of code in your article that exceeds xl characters in length. (Shorter snippets of code that appear in text will exist typeset in Courier New and run in with the balance of the text.) If an appendix contains a mix of code and explanatory text, please submit a file that contains the entire appendix, with the lawmaking keyed in 8-point Courier New.

Submitting supplemental materials

APA tin identify supplemental materials online, available via the published commodity in the PsycArticles® database. Please see Supplementing Your Article With Online Material for more details.

Educational impact and implications statement

Delight submit a short statement of 2–iii sentences, entitled "Educational impact and implications argument." It should be inserted afterward the abstract on the revised manuscript file and should be written in manifestly English for the educated public. These statements should summarize the article's findings and why they are important. To be maximally useful, these statements should provide a bottom-line, take-abode message that is authentic and easily understood. In add-on, they should be able to be translated into media-appropriate statements for use in press releases and on social media (e.g., Twitter). Please refer to the Guidance for Translational Abstracts and Public Significance Statements page to help you write these statements.

Permissions

Authors of accepted papers must obtain and provide to the editor on final acceptance all necessary permissions to reproduce in print and electronic form any copyrighted piece of work, including test materials (or portions thereof), photographs, and other graphic images (including those used equally stimuli in experiments).

On advice of counsel, APA may decline to publish whatever epitome whose copyright status is unknown.

• Download Permissions Alert Class (PDF, 13KB)

Academic writing and English language editing services

Authors who feel that their manuscript may benefit from additional academic writing or language editing support prior to submission are encouraged to seek out such services at their host institutions, engage with colleagues and discipline matter experts, and/or consider several vendors that offer discounts to APA authors. Delight annotation that APA does not endorse or take responsibleness for the service providers listed. Information technology is strictly a referral service. Use of such service is not mandatory for publication in an APA journal. Use of one or more of these services does not guarantee pick for peer review, manuscript credence, or preference for publication in any APA periodical.

Publication policies

APA policy prohibits an writer from submitting the aforementioned manuscript for concurrent consideration by two or more publications.

Run across besides APA Journals® Internet Posting Guidelines.

APA requires authors to reveal whatever possible disharmonize of interest in the conduct and reporting of research (eastward.g., financial interests in a test or procedure, funding by pharmaceutical companies for drug research).

• Download Disclosure of Interests Grade (PDF, 38KB)

In light of irresolute patterns of scientific noesis broadcasting, APA requires authors to provide information on prior dissemination of the data and narrative interpretations of the information/research appearing in the manuscript (e.g., if some or all were presented at a briefing or meeting, posted on a listserv, shared on a website, including academic social networks like ResearchGate, etc.). This data (ii–4 sentences) must be provided as part of the Author Note.

Authors of accustomed manuscripts are required to transfer the copyright to APA.

• For manuscripts not funded by the Welcome Trust or the Research Councils UK
  Publication Rights (Copyright Transfer) Form (PDF, 83KB)
• For manuscripts funded by the Wellcome Trust or the Research Councils UK
  Wellcome Trust or Research Councils United kingdom Publication Rights Form (PDF, 34KB)

Ethical Principles

Information technology is a violation of APA Ethical Principles to publish "every bit original information, information that take been previously published" (Standard 8.xiii).

On occasion it may be advisable to publish several reports referring to the same database. The author should inform the editor at the time of submission most all previously published or submitted reports and their relation to the current submission, so the editor can judge if the article represents a new contribution. Readers also should exist informed; the text of an article should cite other reports that used the aforementioned sample (or a subsample) or the same data and methods.

In addition, APA Ethical Principles specify that "after research results are published, psychologists practice not withhold the data on which their conclusions are based from other competent professionals who seek to verify the substantive claims through reanalysis and who intend to utilize such data only for that purpose, provided that the confidentiality of the participants can be protected and unless legal rights concerning proprietary data forbid their release" (Standard 8.14).

APA expects authors to adhere to these standards. Specifically, APA expects authors to have their data available throughout the editorial review process and for at least 5 years after the appointment of publication.

Authors are required to state in writing that they take complied with APA ethical standards in the treatment of their sample, human or fauna, or to describe the details of treatment.

• Download Certification of Compliance With APA Ethical Principles Form (PDF, 26KB)

The APA Ethics Role provides the full Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Lawmaking of Conduct electronically on its website in HTML, PDF, and Word format. Yous may too request a copy by emailing or calling the APA Ethics Office (202-336-5930). You lot may too read "Ethical Principles," Dec 1992, American Psychologist, Vol. 47, pp. 1597–1611.

Other information

Visit the Journals Publishing Resource Center for more resources for writing, reviewing, and editing manufactures for publishing in APA journals.

Editorial Board

Editor

Panayiota Kendeou, PhD
University of Minnesota, United States

Associate editors

Olusola Adesope, PhD
Washington State University, United States

Daniel Ansari, PhD
The University of Western Ontario, Canada

Jason Anthony, PhD
University of Southward Florida, U.s.

Matthew L. Bernacki, PhD
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States

Rebecca Collie, PhD
Academy of New South Wales, Australia

Jill Fitzgerald, PhD
The University of Due north Carolina at Chapel Hill, United states

Samuel Greiff, PhD
University of Luxembourg, Grand duchy of luxembourg

Beth Kurtz-Costes, PhD
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Colina, United states

Jamaal Matthews, PhD
Academy of Michigan, United States

Jeannette Mancilla-Martinez, EdD
Vanderbilt University, Us

Matthew T. McCrudden, PhD
Pennsylvania Land University, United States

Kristen McMaster, PhD
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, United States

Krista Muis, PhD
McGill University, Canada

Erika Patall, PhD
University of Southern California, United States

David Purpura, PhD
Purdue University, U.s.a.

Tobias Richter, DPhil
Wurzburg University, Germany

Rod Roscoe, PhD
Arizona Land University Polytechnic, United States

Haley Vlach, PhD
University of Wisconsin–Madison, United States

Consulting editors

Patricia A. Alexander, PhD
University of Maryland, Usa

Martha Alibali, PhD
University of Wisconsin–Madison, United states

Ariel Aloe, PhD
University of Iowa, Usa

Rui Alexandre Alves, PhD
University of Porto, Portugal

Stephen Aguilar, PhD
University of Southern California, United States

Eric M. Anderman, PhD
The Ohio State University, United States

David Aparisi, PhD
Academy of Alicante, Espana

Christine L. Bae, PhD
Virginia Commonwealth University, Usa

Amanda Baker, PhD
Iowa State University, U.s.

Christina Barbieri, PhD
University of Delaware, U.s.

Marcia Barnes, PhD
Vanderbilt University, United States

Roderick W. Barron, PhD
Academy of Guelph, Canada

Sarit Barzilai, PhD
Academy of Haifa, Israel

Sebastian Bergold, PhD
TU Dortmund University, Federal republic of germany

Gina Biancarosa, EdD
University of Oregon, Usa

Catherine Bohn-Gettler, PhD
College of Saint Benedict/St. John's University, United States

Francesca Borgonovi, PhD
University Higher London, United Kingdom

Geoffrey D. Borman, PhD
University of Wisconsin–Madison, U.s.a.

Ryan P. Bowles, PhD
Michigan State University, The states

Jason Braasch, PhD
University of Memphis, Usa

Lee Branum-Martin, PhD
Georgia State Academy, United States

Ivar Braten, PhD
University of Oslo, Norway

Anne Britt, PhD
Northern Illinois, Usa

Okan Bulut, PhD
University of Alberta, Canada

Fabrizio Butera, PhD
University of Lausanne, Switzerland

Andrew Butler, PhD
Washington University, St. Louis, United States

Kate Cain, PhD
Lancaster Academy, United Kingdom

Maria Carlo, PhD
University of South Florida, United states

Gina Cervetti, PhD
Michigan State Academy, U.s.a.

Jason A. Chen, PhD
College of William & Mary, The states

Clark A. Chinn, PhD
Rutgers University, United States

Eunsoo Cho, PhD
Michigan Country Academy, United states

Jason Chow, PhD
University of Maryland, United States

Donald Compton, PhD
Florida State University, Us

Pierre Cormier, PhD
Université de Moncton, Canada

Scotty D. Craig, PhD
Arizona State University, United States

Jennifer G. Cromley, PhD
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States

Hélène Deacon, DPhil
Dalhousie University, Canada

Oliver Dickhäuser, PhD
Academy of Mannheim, Germany

Andrew J. Elliot, PhD
University of Rochester, United states

Logan Fiorella, PhD
University of Georgia, United states

Helenrose Fives, PhD
Montclair Land University, United States

Barbara R. Foorman, PhD
Florida State University, United States

David Francis, PhD
Academy of Houston, United States

Jan C. Frijters, PhD
Brock University, Canada

Lynn Southward. Fuchs, PhD
Vanderbilt Academy, The states

Emily R. Fyfe, PhD
Indiana University, United States

David Galbraith, MC
Academy of Southampton, United Kingdom

Emily Phillips Galloway, EdD
Vanderbilt University, United States

Dragan Gasevic, PhD
Monash University, Australia

Hanna Gaspard, PhD
University of Tubingen, Frg

Hunter Gehlbach, PhD
John Hopkins Academy, U.s.

George Georgiou, PhD
University of Alberta, Usa

Susan R. Goldman, PhD
Academy of Illinois, Chicago, United states

Amanda Goodwin, PhD
Vanderbilt Academy, U.s.

Arthur Graesser, PhD
University of Memphis, U.s.a.

Steve Graham, PhD
Arizona State University, U.s.

DeLeon 50. Grey, PhD
North Carolina Land Academy, United States

Jeffrey Alan Greene, PhD
Academy of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States

John T. Guthrie, PhD
University of Maryland College Park, U.s.a.

Antonio P. Gutierrez de Blume, PhD
Georgia Southern Academy, United States

Peter Haplin, PhD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States

Karen R. Harris, EdD
Arizona State Academy, United states of america

Sara Hart, PhD
Florida Country University, United states of america

Michael A. Hebert, PhD
Academy of Nebraska–Lincoln, United States

Paul R. Hernandez, PhD
W Virginia University, United States

Jonathan Hilpert, PhD
University of Nevada Las Vegas, Usa

Flaviu Adrian Hodis, PhD
Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

Marcus Johnson, PhD
University of Cincinnati, U.s.

Nancy C. Jordan, EdD
University of Delaware, United States

Johanna Kaakinen, PhD
University of Turku, Finland

Avi Kaplan, PhD
Temple Academy, Usa

Sihui (Echo) Ke, PhD
University of Kentucky, United States

Carita Kiili, PhD
Tampere University, Republic of finland

Immature-Suk Kim, PhD
University of California, Irvine

James Southward. Kim, EdD
Harvard Academy, Us

Robert M. Klassen, PhD
University of York, U.k.

Thilo Kleickmann, PhD
Kiel University, Germany

Uta Klusmann, PhD
University of Kiel, Germany

Alison C. Koenka, PhD
Virginia Commonwealth Academy, United States

Ken Koedinger, PhD
Carnegie Mellon Academy, United States

Nidhi Kohli, PhD
Academy of Minnesota, United States

Revathy Kumar, PhD
University of Toledo, United States

Nicole Landi, PhD
Academy of Connecticut, United States

Fani Lauermann, PhD
Technische Univeristät Dortmund, Germany

Pui-Wa Lei, PhD
Pennsylvania State University, United States

Erica Lembke, PhD
Academy of Missouri, Columbia, United States

Lisa Linnenbrink- Garcia, PhD
Michigan State Academy, United States

Alexandra List, PhD
Pennsylvania State University, U.s.a.

Jessica Logan, PhD
Ohio State Academy, U.s.a.

Doug Lombardi, PhD
University of Maryland, U.s.

Oliver Lüdtke, PhD
Leibniz Establish for Science and Mathematics Education, Germany

Gigi Luk, PhD
McGill University, Canada

Joseph P. Magliano, PhD
Georgia State University, United States

Gwen C. Marchand, PhD
University of Nevada Las Vegas, U.s.a.

Scott Marley, PhD
Arizona State University, United States

Jacob M. Marszalek, PhD
University of Missouri–Kansas Metropolis, United states of america

Andrew J. Martin, PhD
University of New South Wales, Australia

Lucia Bricklayer, PhD
Padova University, Italy

Richard E. Mayer, PhD
Academy of California, Santa Barbara, United States

Catherine McBride, PhD
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

David Miele, PhD
Boston Higher, United States

Katherine Muenks, PhD
University of Texas at Austin, The states

P. Karen Murphy, PhD
Pennsylvania State University, United States

Benjamin Nagengast, PhD
University of Tübingen, Germany

Johannes Naumann, PhD
Academy of Wuppertal, Germany

Kristie J. Newton, PhD
Temple University, United states

Christoph Niepel, PhD
Academy of Luxembourg, Grand duchy of luxembourg

Nikos Ntoumanis, PhD
University of Southern Denmark, Denmark

Eastward. Michael Nussbaum, PhD
University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Usa

Fred Paas, PhD
Erasmus University Rotterdam & University of Wollongong, the Netherlands

Reinhard Pekrun, PhD
University of Munich, Germany

Peng Peng, PhD
Academy of Texas at Austin, United States

Harsha Perera, PhD
University of Nevada Las Vegas, United States

Tony Perez, PhD
Quondam Dominion University, Us

Yaacov Petscher, PhD
Florida State University, United States

Stephen Peverly, PhD
Columbia University, United States

Shayne Piasta, PhD
Ohio Land Academy, United States

Karen Due east. Rambo- Hernandez, PhD
West Virginia University, Usa

Martina Rau, PhD
University of Wisconsin–Madison, United States

Gert Rijlaarsdam, PhD
University of Amsterdam, kingdom of the netherlands

Joseph Rios, PhD
University of Minnesota, The states

Greg Roberts, PhD
Academy of Texas at Austin, United states of america

Kristy A. Robinson, PhD
McGill University, Canada

Emily Rosenzweig, PhD
Academy of Georgia, United States

Cary Roseth, PhD
Michigan Land University, United States

Jean-Francois Rouet, PhD
University of Poitier, French republic

Amy Gillespie Rouse, PhD
Southern Methodist University, U.s.

Teya Rutherford, PhD
University of Delaware, United states

John Sabatini, PhD
University of Memphis, United States

Lalo Salmerón, PhD
Academy of Valencia, Espana

Tanya Santangelo, PhD
Arcadia University, U.s.

Chris Schatschneider, PhD
Florida State University, United States

Katharina Scheiter, PhD
Leibniz- Institut für Wissensmedien, Germany

Katerina Schenke, PhD
University of California, Los Angeles, United states

Ulrich Schiefele, DPhil
University of Potsdam, Germany

Jennifer A. Schmidt, PhD
Michigan State University, United States

Sascha Schroeder, PhD
University of Göttingen, Germany

Dale H. Schunk, PhD
University of N Carolina, Greensboro, United states

Malte Schwinger, PhD
Universität Marburg, Germany

Corwin Senko, PhD
State Academy of New York, New Paltz, U.s.

Priti Shah, PhD
Academy of Michigan, United States

Robert Siegler, PhD
Columbia University, U.s.a.

Gale M. Sinatra, PhD
University of Southern California, United states

Olivenne Skinner, PhD
Wayne Country University, United States

Benjamin Solomon, PhD
University at Albany, Us

Birgit Spinath, PhD
Heidelberg University, Germany

Jörn Sparfeledt, PhD
Saarland Academy, Germany

Elsbeth Stern, PhD
ETH, Switzerland

H. Lee Swanson, PhD
University of California, Riverside, United States

Keith William Thiede, PhD
Boise State University, United States

Theresa A. Thorkildsen, PhD
University of Illinois, Chicago, Usa

Minna Torppa, PhD
University of Jyväskylä, Finland

Gregory Trevors, PhD
Academy of Southern Carolina, U.s.a.

Yuuko Uchikoshi, EdD
University of California, Davis, Usa

Timothy Fifty. Urdan, PhD
Santa Clara University, Us

Ellen L. Usher, PhD
University of Kentucky, Us

Tamara Van Gog, PhD
Utrecht University, the Netherlands

Maarten Vansteenkiste, PhD
Ghent University, Kingdom of belgium

Sharon R. Vaughn, PhD
University of Texas at Austin, United States

Eduardo Vidal-Abarca, PhD
University of Valencia, Kingdom of spain

Regina Vollmeyer, PhD
Goethe-Universität, Deutschland

Jeanne Wansek, PhD
Vanderbilt University, United States

Christopher A. Was, PhD
Kent State University, U.s.a.

Kathryn Wentzel, PhD
Academy of Maryland, U.s.

Kay Wijekumar, PhD
University of Texas, United States

Jeffrey Williams, PhD
University of South Florida, United States

Joanna P. Williams, PhD
Columbia University, U.s.a.

Joshua Wilson, PhD
University of Delaware, United states

Phillip H. Winne, PhD
Simon Fraser University, Canada

Kui Xie, PhD
Ohio State University, United States

Henrik Daae Zachrisson, PhD
University of Oslo, Norway

Steffen Zitzmann, PhD
Eberhard Karls Universitat Tubingen, Deutschland

Haomin (Stanley) Zhang, PhD
E China Normal University, China

Li-Fang Zhang, PhD
The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Sharon Zumbrunn, PhD
Virginia Commonwealth University, United States

Abstracting & Indexing

Abstracting and indexing services providing coverage of Periodical of Educational Psychology ^®

• Academic OneFile
• Academic Search Alumni Edition
• Bookish Search Complete
• Bookish Search Elite
• Academic Search Index
• Bookish Search Premier
• Cabell'due south Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Psychology
• Child Evolution & Adolescent Studies
• Current Abstracts
• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences
• EBSCO MegaFILE
• Education Abstracts
• Teaching Full Text
• Education Research Complete
• Instruction Source
• Educational Administration Abstracts
• Educational Research Abstracts Online
• Educator'due south Reference Complete
• ERIC
• ERIH (European Reference Alphabetize for the Humanities and Social Sciences)
• Expanded Bookish ASAP
• General OneFile
• College Education Abstracts
• Humanities and Social Sciences Index Retrospective
• Humanities Index Retrospective
• IBZ / IBR (Internationale Bibliographie der Rezensionen Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftlicher Literatur)
• InfoTrac Custom
• Journal Citations Written report: Social Sciences Edition
• Linguistics & Language Behavior Abstracts
• MasterFILE Consummate
• MasterFILE Aristocracy
• MasterFILE Premier
• MLA International Bibliography
• NSA Collection
• OCLC
• OmniFile Full Text Mega
• PASCAL
• Professional Collection
• Professional Development Collection
• Professional ProQuest Cardinal
• ProQuest Fundamental
• ProQuest Discovery
• ProQuest Education Journals
• ProQuest Platinum Periodicals
• ProQuest Professional Instruction
• ProQuest Psychology Journals
• ProQuest Inquiry Library
• Psychology Drove
• PsycInfo
• PsycLine
• Enquiry into College Education Abstracts
• RILM Abstracts of Music Literature
• SafetyLit
• SCOPUS
• Social Sciences Citation Index
• Social Sciences Alphabetize Retrospective
• Studies on Women and Gender Abstracts
• Instructor Reference Center
• TOC Premier

Special Bug

• Advanced Learning Technologies

  Special issue of APA'south Periodical of Educational Psychology, Vol. 105, No. 4, Nov 2013. The manufactures illustrate how advanced learning technologies are user-friendly platforms for scientific research in addition to addressing applied enquiry questions in rigorous ways.

Open Science

Transparency and Openness Promotion

APA endorses the Transparency and Openness Promotion (Acme) Guidelines past a community working group in conjunction with the Center for Open Science (Nosek et al. 2015). The Elevation Guidelines encompass eight fundamental aspects of research planning and reporting that can exist followed by journals and authors at three levels of compliance.

For instance:

• Level 1: Disclosure—The commodity must disclose whether or not the materials are available.
• Level 2: Requirement—The commodity must share materials when legally and ethically permitted (or disclose the legal and/or upstanding restriction when non permitted).
• Level three: Verification—A third party must verify that the standard is met.

As outlined in Dr. Panayiota Kendeou's countdown editorial (Kendeou, 2021), empirical enquiry, including meta-analyses, submitted to the J ournal of Educational Psychology must, at a minimum, meet Level 1 (Disclosure) for all eight aspects of research planning and reporting. Authors should include a subsection in their methods description titled "Transparency and openness." This subsection should detail the efforts the authors have fabricated to comply with the TOP guidelines.

The list below summarizes the minimal TOP requirements of the journal. Please refer to the Center for Open up Scientific discipline Superlative guidelines for details, and contact the editor (Panayiota Kendeou, PhD) with whatsoever further questions. APA recommends sharing data, materials, and code via trusted repositories (due east.g., APA'southward repository on the Open Scientific discipline Framework (OSF)), and we encourage investigators to preregister their studies and analysis plans prior to conducting the research. There are many bachelor preregistration forms (east.m., the APA Preregistration for Quantitative Research in Psychology template, ClininalTrials.gov, or other preregistration templates available via OSF). Completed preregistration forms should be posted on a publicly accessible registry system (e.1000., OSF, ClinicalTrials.gov, or other trial registries in the WHO Registry Network).

A list of participating journals is also available from APA.

The following list presents the eight fundamental aspects of inquiry planning and reporting, the TOP level required by theJ ournal of Educational Psychology, and a brief description of the journal'due south policy.

• Citation: Level 1, Disclosure—All data, program lawmaking, and other methods adult past others should be appropriately cited in the text and listed in the references section.
• Data Transparency: Level one, Disclosure—Commodity states whether the raw and/or processed information on which study conclusions are based are available and, if and then, where to admission them.
• Analytic Methods (Code) Transparency: Level 1, Disclosure—Article states whether computer code or syntax needed to reproduce analyses in an article is available and, if then, where to admission it.
• Research Materials Transparency: Level one, Disclosure—Article states whether materials described in the method section are available and, if so, where to access them.
• Design and Analysis Transparency (Reporting Standards): Level 1, Disclosure—The journal encourages the use of APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards ([JARS-Quant, JARS-Qual, and/or MARS]). The periodical also encourages the use of the 21-word statement, reporting i) how the sample size was determined, 2) all data exclusions, 3) all manipulations, and 4) all study measures. See Simmons, Nelson, & Simonsohn (2012) for details.
• Written report Preregistration: Level 1, Disclosure—Article states whether the report blueprint and (if applicable) hypotheses of any of the work reported was preregistered and, if so, where to access it. Authors may submit a masked copy via stable link or supplemental material or may provide a link after acceptance.
• Analysis Program Preregistration: Level 1, Disclosure—Article states whether whatsoever of the work reported preregistered an assay plan and, if so, where to admission it. Authors may submit a masked copy via stable link or supplemental material or may provide a link after acceptance.

Other open scientific discipline initiatives

• Open Science badges: Offered
• Public significance statements: Offered
• Author contribution statements using CRediT: Not required
• Registered Reports: Published
• Replications: Published

Explore open scientific discipline at APA .

walkerstrathe.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/edu

Share this post